Category: Projects

Keep your eyes posted on this page! I will be updating it whenever I see a noticeable event happen with these accounts.

This article is heavily inspired by this fantastic video

PLACE YOUR BETS FOLKS, A GREAT FRIEND OF MINE (who wishes to stay anonymous) IS GOING TO MAKE THE ULTIMATE SACRIFICE AND FIGURE OUT WHAT EXACTLY BLUESKY’S TRUST AND SAFETY’S POLICY IS FOR LOLICON!!!

As of writing, Bluesky’s policy has been told to us through a moderation reply for a ban appeal long ago. Essentially decisions depend on what “the average person” considers CSAM… That can’t possibly be the case because last I checked T&S can’t possibly be a true neutral source of “the average person” So- I want to figure out myself what “the average person” thinks is and isn’t CSAM.

The methodology is as follows. Over the course of 2-3 weeks we will

• Have several accounts posting different degrees of lewdity
• Post a handful of loli & shota imagery a day under the appropriate tags
• Not interact outside of just posting
• Make explicit that the posts involve a loli/shota

What are the degrees of lewdity?
This is what I will use to trial and error what they consider CSAM. Starting from the most lewd to the least lewd.

1. Porn (Not doing this, this is a clear cut T&S disapproved action)
2. Indirect Porn (I.E no visible lewd but there’s clearly lewd happening)
3. Nudity (Just naked lolis, it’ll pass if its artistic nudity right???)
4. Lewd Clothing (Think swimsuits. Are beach episodes allowed on bluesky?)
5. Implied Lewd Context (You’ll see what this means later)
6. Just talking about lewd lolis (This is gonna be a fun one)
7. SFW loli (If this gets you banned I think its over for everyone.)

That makes 6 accounts… I’m soo sorry for spamming the feeds everyone BUT WE CAN’T BE GOING AROUND IN THE DARK TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHATS GOING ON WITH THE DAMN T&S!!! Now, without further ado- lets see our contestants!

Contestant #0 Kanna [Degree: Loli Porn]

Disqualified by Arron Bluesky…

Contestant #1 Megumin [Degree: Nudity]

Megumin will be posting nude lolis, no sex, nothing lewd, just nude lolis.

Contestant #2 Sagiri [Degree: Indirect NSFW]

Sagiri will be posting indirect NSFW involving lolis

Contestant #3 Runa [Degree: Lewd Clothing]

Runa will be posting lolis in scantily clad or revealing clothes.

Contestant #4 Jahy [Degree: Implied Lewd Context]

Jahy will be posting cropped out images from loli porn that hints at lewd events

Contestant #5 Konata [Degree: Just talking about lewd lolis]

Konata will be TALKING ABOUT RAMMING CUNNY 24/7

Contestant #6 Shiro [Degree: SFW loli]

Shiro will just post SFW loli BORRRRINNNNNGGGGGGGG!!!
(but we need a control)

Thats it as of 12/28/2024! See ya all soon 🙂

Addendum A: 12/28/24 Starting Day

Contestant Megumin is getting their artistic nudity claim challenged by bluesky moderation as the adult content label is being slapped on her images instantly upon posting. As of writing all three of her images have been auto labled.

Addendum B: 12/30/24 Third Day

Well, if you bet Megumin would be the first to go COLLECT YOUR WINNINGS NOW because that account is now banned. I should elaborate more on what the end result for this experiment will be. I will be writing a followup article and unlike bluesky T&S, I will provide actual examples of what got each account banned (and give some neat stats on engagement). In future I plan on repeating this experiment with cub art & linking nsfw offsite.

Runa had this image automodded (and nothing else…) I do have to wonder if this is automatically placed liked I assume or if this means a bluesky mod is now looking at this page. If its the ladder, its odd that THIS is the only one out of 9 posts. Ig they don’t like beds???

P.S. Tonight is doomsday. I figured it’d be a good time to put these accounts to the test, that 9 images/posts is enough of a dataset to figure out what bluesky does and does not allow. Tonight I will be reporting every one of these accounts directly to bluesky. (Btw, the methodology for reporting is reporting the account itself under other, and reporting the latest post also under other)

The reports are in… lets see who survives in the morning.

Oh you will always be
Doing it for free
Oh you will never be
Compensated monetarily
Wannabe mod on BlueSky

PREVIOUSLY ON THE FEAR&DELIGHT ANTI CSAM SAGA

After my previous run in with legitimate honest to god child porn online I figured “damn- I’m not doing enough here to combat this stuff.” You see I wont rest until my community and by extension my home is free from child exploitation. I’d rather DRAW someone catching a case, not catch that case myself thank you very much!

As of the time of writing my methodology for rooting out CSAM content has been to manually monitor my @SCL and Kodo Weekly feeds for bad actors. I then do some digging and see if there’s anyone else to add. For those curious my criteria for reporting is the same for adding accounts to the CSAM block-list

I’ve recently noticed however that there’s a bit of a problem with that list- a large chunk of accounts are still there remaining! Now, I could go in and manually re-report these accounts but that’s going to take a long long time. So, I figured I’d do us all a favor and develop a UserScript for everyone to enjoy. Consider it my late Christmas present for you all (because this is gonna be done awhile after Christmas) Right now its very simple and basic, but I aim to add a load of quality of life features that I always find really tedious normally such as reporting people. Here’s a demonstration.

What was that? What just happened? This my friend, is a UserScript! Think of it like a browser extension that has a much lower barrier to entry and allows you to see the code of what you’re running! This particular UserScript aims to be similar to the 4chan x UserScript in that it adds various helpful additions to the website all with a handy menu for customization! I still don’t know what to call it so feel free to suggest names!

My programming skills are admittedly rusty, but hopefully it should work fine enough (given they don’t ever make a major change to layout of the website and break everything)

The current planned features for v1.0 are as follows.

• Expanding the menus on profiles (I.e pinning buttons to easily add people to lists, and an easily accessible report button)
• Flagging system for CSAM (see the video: It tries to detect bad actors automatically… but its up to you to not take the flagging system for its word)

Future content that has higher priority because it provides personal utility.

• Adding users to lists via post.

Future content I might add if I ever get around to it (or pull it off) are as follows.

• A favorites button & favorites tab (I don’t plan on hosting server infrastructure for this, so the fact you favorite something wont be visible to anyone but you. It will be stored in browser too so don’t clear your browser storage for Blue Sky if you want your faves kept!)
• Making this baby open source!!! (sorry in advance for my spaghetti code)

That’s all for now! My kofi is https://ko-fi.com/fearanddelight if you’d like to support me and my jack of all trades ass content.

https://bsky.app/profile/fearanddelight.work/lists/3lblac3436r2r

Please email [email protected] or DM me on bluesky if you know accounts that should be added, removed, or know dogwhistles to add to the end of this page.

With this list receiving more attention online I figure I’d elaborate more on why this list exists, as well as criteria for being added.

DISCLOSURE: I AM A PROUD LOLICON ARTIST!!!

Yes… get your laughs out (The lolicon is against CSAM? Isn’t that like an oxymoron??) Let me get this clear,

• I am not a pedophile. I do not have attraction to IRL minors.
• I do not condone people harming children.
• Yes, the age of consent is perfectly fine where it is currently!

Now that we got the icks out of the way, here’s the rundown!

What does this list block?

Block users that intend to find or distribute CSAM & minors who prostitute themselves online.

Why does this list exist?
This list started as a way to manually moderate the Loli, Shota & Kodo weekly feeds. It is combined with a big word filter to get rid of CSAM content invading the #loli & #shota tags. Considering the popularity of not only the list but my account I figure this as a special opprotunity to do genuine good, though I have added responsibility to ensure the list isnt used for evil or to bring harm to innocent people.

This list operates on an innocent until proven guilty policy.
I.E if someone just “looks” young I wont add them. I need proof beyond a reasonable doubt that someone is either distributing or obtaining CSAM.

The Criteria for Being Added:

The following are some of the factors taken into account when adding to the blocklist…
(For underage accounts, they must be clearly underage & uploading/seeking out CSAM)

• Indication of minor status & engagement/uploading of nsfw material irl or otherwise
• Links advertised publically as child porn
• Engaging with CSAM (this opperates on the assumption that a person would be able to discern the person is a minor through the single post they interact with alone based on the criteria here.)
• Account explicitly states intention to take advantage of real children sexually.
• Account following many sexualized minor accounts

Not Criteria for Being Added:

• Just Being A MAP

No matter your or my own stance on MAPs, merely being a MAP does not equal harm to children. For instance, there are MAPs who don’t wish harm on children or swear off contact with them entirely.

• ERP only account

Some accounts will use terms like “pedo mommy” or self-label as a pedo but make it explicit they dont condone irl contact, or irl attraction. I wont go after RP accounts.

• Semantics issues

Self describing as an “irl loli” or “irl shota” is not enough by itself. (loli in some circles is a word for a body type, not strictly to do with age.)

• Simply linking an encrypted messaging service

While yes it is very suspicious to have a Telegram, Teleguard, Session, or other messaging service linked it does not indicate intent by itself (its not a crime to want privacy)

• I am personally unsure

If I am personally unsure of what to make of an account I come across I will not add them to the list. Id rather let someone slip past than add someone who is innocent.

edit: this section used to be suspected dogwhistles and suspected lingo, but to avoid false positives/witch hunts based on incorrect assumptions I have decided to omit this. (in light of witch-hunts based on misunderstanding such as the recent Zako song misunderstanding I think its best to avoid facilitating the creation of false positives. I dont want someone being harrassed just because someone after reading this saw they have an emoji in their handle and it turns out theyre just a software engineer). Additionally ive decided to do several things to the article.

1. Omit content that would lead to wrongful assumptions even to innocent accounts listed on the “do not add” criteria.

2. Refine criteria to be even more even less “vibes” based. Some of the criteria makes assumptions or is frankily redundant.

3. I removed the site image. I personally havent seen the site pop up in months, so safe to say its gone for good atleast as far as I can tell on bluesky.

4. I ammended the MAP criteria after some talks with one of their community members (who will stay anonymous). Rest assured, this isnt a “MAPs are immune” clause, but more a “Yeah, just because theyre a MAP shouldnt mark them for immediate ban” clause.